Talking Tactics
Hmmm? So still no MLS win since the opening game against Toronto and still no points on the road. Maybe it's time to take an in-depth look at the tactics that Teitur Thordason is employing (and when I say "in-depth look" I mean "hastily assembled ramblings").
Specifically though is he getting the formation right? Let's look at his options;
4-4-2- Is what they play now. The pluses are that the coach likes it (obviously), the players understand it, and the Whitecaps have mostly stayed in games whilst playing it. The minuses are that it lacks flexibility and the two strikers are often left isolated (especially away from home). Yet once everybody is fit it could well be the best system for this group of players.
4-4-1-1- This would keep the basic structure but allow Chiumiento to play behind the striker and give our best play-maker more freedom to create chances and link up with the midfield (Camilo could probably also fill this role). The problem is that it leaves us looking light in attack and reliant on a "mercurial" player.
4-3-1-2- In this system the Caps can still have a play-maker but they also get two up front for greater potency. The downsides are that they lose the width that has produced so many of their goals.
4-3-3- Three in midfield still look to be a problem but with three up front the midfield trio has less need to push forward so can remain more solid. The team would probably be more dangerous going forward but could wind up heavily outnumbered when under pressure.
5-3-2- This keeps two up front and loads up numbers at the back with three central defenders. The full-backs could even play as wing backs at home but again we lose the attacking wide players that can be so effective.
Pick your poison below. All of these options have something going for them and something against them. Hey! You should even feel free to to submit your own outlandish 2-2-2-2-2 system or the like if you wish, maybe you will transform the future of Canadian soccer (but I doubt it).
But first the result of last weeks poll which asked "Which Whitecap Worries You the Most". I know that a lot of you wanted "none of the above" but you can't always get what you want.
Eric Hassli stormed into an early lead but was eventually caught and tied by Jay Nolly who made a last minute surge. Perhaps surprisingly 23% were most worried about Thordason with Camilo and Chiumiento barely causing a furrowed brow.
Now let's get out the vote for the big poll of the day!
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
None of the above?
Actually, I think a 4-1-3-2 or a 4-4-2 diamond formation might work well. A 4-1-3-2 starting formation would allow us to start with a defensive midfielder infront of the back line, put a playmaker like Dunfield in the middle where he can command the attack and still employ the wings. The W formation at the top allows us to move the ball in triangles along the sides, but it does leave us think on attacking support through the middle. If Khalfan comes on for the DM, you go back to a 4-4-2. If he comes on for the CAM, you go to a diamond.
We could switch to a diamond with Chiumiento supporting the two strikers, and Salinas and Teibert on the wings which would leave us vulnerable in the middle, so a a guy like Koffie or Alkoul could take up that defensive midfielder role.
Our strengths are Dunfield and the wing attack game feeding Hassli/Harris/Salgado as a target man, or Camilo as a creative attacker. We need a system that exploits that. We are not strong enough or big enough to win through the middle, so a 4-3-3 or a 5-3-2 wouldn’t be a good use of our resources.
Failing that an 8-1-1 might alleviate our defensive problems.
Slightly annoyed
that I didn’t think of the 4-1-3-2 as I kind of like that suggestion.
Personally though I would stick with 4-4-2 for now. When we look a mess it’s mostly down to individual errors rather than the system itself. Hopefully we will progress tactically over time but for now I just want to see how that system works with everybody fit (assuming that day ever arrives).
by Russell Berrisford on May 2, 2011 11:59 AM PDT reply actions
Which formation
gets Khalfan, SWISS RONALDINHO, and Camilo on the field, but not Vagenas? Play that one.
Nos Audietis
I was thinking to myself this morning “man, I hope Russell has a poll post today. This is the most important election of all.”
Manager at Vancouver Whitecaps and western Canadian soccer website Eighty Six Forever and infrequently-posting flunky at Edmonton Oilers blog The Copper & Blue.
yes, but the early release of the results clearly influenced other voters.
by Russell Berrisford on May 2, 2011 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions
I like how the conservative 4-4-2 is winning but the radical 4-3-1-2 is making a surprisingly strong showing.
(I voted 4-4-1-1, which is also appropriate.)
Manager at Vancouver Whitecaps and western Canadian soccer website Eighty Six Forever and infrequently-posting flunky at Edmonton Oilers blog The Copper & Blue.
by Benjamin Massey on May 2, 2011 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions
4-4-2
I like the idea of the 4-1-3-2, but I think with all our personal problems a formation that everyone is familiar with is best.
I wonder though, will Hassli or Salgado start? Or will Thordarson start the two big guys and rest Camilo? Starting two big guys, particularly if we play Teibert and Chiumentio on the wings and cross everything into the box, could have its advantages. This seems to be what Thordarson wants to do, so I wouldn’t be surprised by it.
"I am not young enough to know everything." by O. Wilde
I’d love to see Hassli – Salgado but really don’t mind Hassli – Camilo; Camilo’s not scoring but he’s had a few decent moments with Hassli.
Manager at Vancouver Whitecaps and western Canadian soccer website Eighty Six Forever and infrequently-posting flunky at Edmonton Oilers blog The Copper & Blue.
by Benjamin Massey on May 3, 2011 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Tactics for the road
As we leave the glorious confines of Empire Field and head to Chicago I wonder, is there a formation that could actually get us some points on the road? Getting the right players on the pitch is key for us and I think the 4-4-1-1 would be the best.
On the back line, Leathers, Janicki, Akloul, Rochat. Midfield, Salinas, Koffie, Dunfield, Teibert. At forward Chiumiento, and at the top Hassli.
This group should allow us to defend through the midfield and give us the ability to move the ball along the ground or through the air.
"I am not young enough to know everything." by O. Wilde

by 







